Menu Search Facebook Twitter
Search Close
  • Capital Coahuila
  • Capital Hidalgo
  • Capital Jalisco
  • Capital Morelos
  • Capital Oaxaca
  • Capital Puebla
  • Capital Quintana Roo
  • Capital Querétaro
  • Capital Veracruz
  • Capital México
  • Capital Michoacán
  • Capital Mujer
  • Reporte Índigo
  • Estadio Deportes
  • The News
  • Efekto
  • Diario DF
  • Capital Edo. de Méx.
  • Green TV
  • Revista Cambio
Radio Capital
Pirata FM
Capital Máxima
Capital FM
Facebook Twitter
X Welcome! Subscribe to our newsletter and receive news, data, statistical and exclusive promotions for subscribers

Supreme Court Sides with Immigrants over Bad Legal Advice

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented

The Supreme Court is seen at day’s end in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2017, photo: AP/J. Scott Applewhite
6 months ago

WASHINGTON – When a lawyer advises that a plea deal is the best option and won’t result in deportation, most immigrants facing criminal charges agree to plead guilty.

But what if the lawyer is wrong, and deportation is certain?

The Supreme Court ruled 6-2 Friday that immigrants in those circumstances can have a second chance in court and risk going to trial, even if the prosecution’s case is very strong.

The justices sided with South Korean native Jae Lee, who has lived most of his life in the United States. Lee pleaded guilty to drug charges in 2009 after his lawyer mistakenly assured him he would not be deported.

In fact, Lee, who had been living in the Memphis, Tennessee, area, pleaded guilty to the kind of serious crime that makes deportation near-automatic for noncitizens.

He was sentenced to a year in prison, but has been behind bars for 7½ years while fighting to withdraw his plea and take his chances at trial, John Bursch, Lee’s Supreme Court lawyer, said.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court that Lee can withdraw the guilty plea on drug charges that his lawyer advised him to enter.

“But for his attorney’s incompetence, Lee would have known that accepting the plea agreement would certainly lead to deportation. Going to trial? Almost certainly,” Roberts wrote.

But in this case, he continued, “that ‘almost’ could make all the difference.”

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented. Thomas wrote that the decision “will have pernicious consequences for the criminal justice system” because plea deals negotiated in good faith may not remain final.

The federal appeals court in Cincinnati had ruled that the evidence against Lee was overwhelming and that he would have been convicted had he rejected the plea offer and gone to trial. Other appeals courts around the country have sided with immigrants in similar circumstances, the position the Supreme Court adopted Friday.

Comments Whatsapp Twitter Facebook Share
More From The News
Latest News

Democrat Jones wins stunning red-state A ...

3 days ago

Asian stocks mixed ahead of Fed rate ann ...

3 days ago

NFL Network suspends analysts over sexua ...

3 days ago

Minnesota announces restrictions on usin ...

3 days ago
Most Popular

French PM says Disputed Labour Bill Open ...

By The Associated Press

Business Leaders Bullish About Long Term ...

By Lázaro González

New Delivery App Rappi Says It's Not Sel ...

By Caitlin Donohue

Power Lunch to Close

By The Associated Press

Daily Exchange: Dollar Continues Descent ...

By Notimex