Democratic lawmakers visit Michigan city to hear from affected families
In this Feb. 26, 2016 photo, Gov. Rick Snyder speaks after attending a Flint Water Interagency Coordinating Committee meeting in Flint, Mich. The state of Michigan restricted Flint from switching water sources last April unless it got approval from Gov. Rick Snyder's administration under the terms of a $7 million loan needed to help transition the city from state management, according to a document released Wednesday, March 2, 2016. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya),
04 of March 2016 18:17:20
WASHINGTON – Federal aid is not needed in Flint, Michigan, where lead-contaminated pipes have resulted in an ongoing public health emergency, a Republican senator said Friday.[caption id="attachment_4012" align="alignright" width="300"] Resident LeeAnne Walters testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing to examine the ongoing situation in Flint, Feb. 3. Photo: AP/Molly Riley.[/caption]Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said he is holding up bipartisan legislation to address the water crisis in Flint because Michigan's Republican governor, Rick Snyder, has not asked for federal help and the state does not need it."Michigan has an enormous budget surplus this year" and a rainy-day fund totaling several hundred million dollars, Lee said. The state has approved $70 million in emergency funding for Flint, and Snyder has requested at least $165 million more toward the Flint emergency."The people and policymakers of Michigan right now have all the government resources they need to fix the problem," Lee said. "The only thing Congress is contributing to the Flint recovery is political grandstanding."Senators from both parties reached a tentative deal last month for a $220 million package to fix and replace lead-contaminated pipes in Flint and other cities, but the bill remains on hold.Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., a key sponsor of the bill, said she was surprised and disappointed that Lee would hold up a bipartisan measure that would "help communities across the country, including in his home state of Utah."If Lee opposes the bill, he should vote against it, "but he should not block it from even getting a vote," Stabenow said.More than two dozen Democrats, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California, visited Flint on Friday to hear from families affected by the water crisis.Rep. Dan Kildee, D-Mich., said the visit allowed lawmakers to hear about Flint's problems firsthand and also served to keep up pressure for Congress to act on the stalled bill. Kildee criticized Lee and other Senate Republicans for delaying the bill and noted that dozens of lawmakers have visited Flint in recent weeks — all Democrats.Republican presidential candidates addressed the Flint crisis for no more than "one fleeting second" at a debate in Detroit Thursday night, Pelosi said. "I think that was really an embarrassment," she said.The visit by Democratic lawmakers "isn't about politicizing" the Flint crisis as Lee and other Republicans have claimed, Pelosi said."This is about accountability, it's about helping, it's about healing. It's about giving people hope and it's about not underutilizing any resource to do that at every level," she said.Stabenow and Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., reached agreement with Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., and other senators last month on a bill to fix lead-contaminated pipes across the country, make other infrastructure improvements and bolster lead-prevention programs nationwide.[caption id="attachment_4013" align="alignleft" width="300"] Hurley Medical Center Pediatric Residency Program Director Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha speaks during a hearing on the Flint water crisis on Capitol Hill in Washington. Photo: AP/Andrew Harnik.[/caption]Supporters said the bill would use federal credit subsidies to provide incentives for up to $700 million in loan guarantees and other financing for water infrastructure projects across the country. Similar problems with aging pipes have cropped up in several states since the Flint crisis became known last year.The Senate bill would be paid for by redirecting up to $250 million from an Energy Department loan program approved in the 2009 economic stimulus law.Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz had placed a hold on the bill last month, but lifted it after reviewing the measure. A spokesman said Cruz will not prevent the bill from moving forward in the Senate.Sen. David Vitter, R-La., also has objected to the bill, which is attached to a broader energy measure being debated in the Senate. Vitter's concerns are unrelated to Flint and center on efforts to expand fishing areas for red snapper and other species in the Gulf of Mexico.Vitter said in a statement that he is hopeful the Senate moves forward with the energy bill in the near future. "In the meantime, I'm working with my colleagues to ensure that my language to help promote fishing opportunities for anglers in the Gulf is not neglected," he said.
BY MATTHEW DALY