Navigation
Suscribe
Menu Search Facebook Twitter
Search Close
Menu ALL SECTIONS
  • Capital Coahuila
  • Capital Hidalgo
  • Capital Jalisco
  • Capital Morelos
  • Capital Oaxaca
  • Capital Puebla
  • Capital Quintana Roo
  • Capital Querétaro
  • Capital Veracruz
  • Capital México
  • Capital Michoacán
  • Capital Mujer
  • Reporte Índigo
  • Estadio Deportes
  • The News
  • Efekto
  • Diario DF
  • Capital Edo. de Méx.
  • Green TV
  • Revista Cambio
Radio Capital
Pirata FM
Capital Máxima
Capital FM
Digital
Prensa
Radio
TV
X
Newsletter
Facebook Twitter
X Welcome! Subscribe to our newsletter and receive news, data, statistical and exclusive promotions for subscribers
Opinion
Thérèse Margolis
Thérèse Margolis Is the World Any Safer Now? The parliamentary elections could swing Iran’s international policy mood either way
Share Facebook Twitter Whatsapp

Last week, more than 30 million Iranians went to the polls to elect two key government bodies: the Majlis (parliament), which will legislate the country’s administrative laws, and the Assembly of Experts, which will be charged with selecting its next supreme leader when and if the sometimes-discreet-sometimes-confrontational Ali Khamenei, who has held the position since the death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1989, retires or dies. (There have been unconfirmed rumors that he is gravely ill.)

Although the final results of that election have yet to be announced — initial reports indicate a landslide victory for the moderates and reformists in Tehran, but overwhelming support for hardliners throughout the rest of the country — what does seem clear is that the elections will be a key test of the U.S.-brokered Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) to ensure that Iran’s nuclear capabilities are limited to peaceful ambitions, thus — in theory anyway — making the world a safer place.

As he enters his last year in office, U.S. President Barack Obama has gambled heavily with his remaining political capital in favor of courting and cajoling Tehran like a prodigal son in the hopes of bringing it back into the fold of the community of nations.

But will that gamble pay off?

So far, Tehran has played along with the reformed-child scenario, alternately touting its commitment to global peace and licking its wounds after its long-awaited vindication for ever having been accused of having sinister nuclear ambitions.

During his national day reception at his residence late last month, Iranian Ambassador to Mexico Jalal Kalantari echoed the spiel of his president Hassan Rouhani, promising to keep to the deal, stressing that Iran has never had anything but peaceful goals for its uranium enrichment program.

“The celebration of the 37th anniversary of the victory of the Islamic revolution coincides with the fulfilment of Iran’s agreement with the world powers called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and with the end of the possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear activities before the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),” Kalantari said.

Kalantari went on to say that, after decades of economic sanctions (brought on by the taking of the U.S. Embassy in 1979, after the fall of the U.S.-backed regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi), Iran had at last “proven to the world that it has been honest with the IAEA and that it has only peaceful intentions regarding its nuclear development.”

He added that Iran is open to dialogue with the international community in order to resolve differences and that Iran considers regional peace and stability as a major priority, playing up his government’s role as a Middle East peacekeeper and enemy of terrorism.

“We hope that the governments in the region as well as all countries in the world are willing to take coherent and joint actions against terrorism and violent extremism,” he said.

Can Iran be trusted to keep its end of the bargain?

Even Obama seemed reluctant to commit to that one.

“Whether it’s supporting terrorist groups like Hezbollah, continued threats directed at Israel, human rights abuses or the unjust detention of American citizens, I understand exactly the kind of dangerous and repressive regime we’re dealing with in Iran,” he told a British journalist after the JCPOA was signed last year.

And Obama admitted that while there will be sporadic IAEA inspections, a deal is in large part based on mutual trust, which, for good reason afgter 37 years reciprocal animosity, is in short supply.

President Rouhani has so far been exceedingly conciliatory toward the West (and the promise of increased economic growth as a result of the removal of sanctions is certainly a big incentive for that change of stripes).

Election officials count ballot papers after the close of polling stations during elections for the parliament and a leadership body called the Assembly of Experts, which has the power to appoint and dismiss the supreme leader, in Tehran February 26, 2016. Photo: Reuters/Raheb Homavandi/TIMA ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY.

Election officials count ballot papers after the close of polling stations during elections for the parliament and a leadership body called the Assembly of Experts, which has the power to appoint and dismiss the supreme leader, in Tehran February 26, 2016. Photo: Reuters/Raheb Homavandi

Increased trade and a seat at the non-pariah table of nations in the world arena are certainly attractive carrots for Iran to give up its confrontational ways.

But the West should also remember to keep a stick handy just in case.

The election results may well be an early indicator of which means of tempering Tehran is best.

Regardless of what happens in the Majlis, the Assembly of Experts is expected to remain staunchly conservative, making real rapprochement with the West difficult if not impossible.

The parliamentary elections, on the other hand, could swing Iran’s international policy mood either way.

Moreover, the Majlis’ influence (which controls the state budget and rubber-stamped government appointments) in external affairs is debatable, since the supreme leader is exactly that — the last voice when it comes to how the country will deal with international issues.

So is the world any safer today than it was before the Iran nuclear deal?

Maybe, maybe not. The jury is still out, as are the final election results, and it seems only time — and an occasional IAEA inspection — will tell.

Comments
Whatsapp Twitter Facebook Share
More from Opinion
By Thérèse Margolis

Learning to Love Viruses

2 months ago
Thérèse Margolis
By Ricardo Castillo

Democracy In Peril

2 months ago
Ricardo Castillo
By Thérèse Margolis

Caught in the Act

3 months ago
Thérèse Margolis
By Ricardo Castillo

Clash of Two Opinion Leaders


Both are in the Mexican government payroll but it will be their points of view which will set the id ...
3 months ago
Ricardo Castillo