Ingredient-driven cooking may swell with the successive waves of fashion but culture remains essential to the enjoyment and understanding of cooking
Italian chef Cristina Palanti poses with a meat cleaver and cooking fork hovering over a plastic pig figurine at the "L'e'Maiala" restaurant in Florence in this October 6, 2012 file photo. REUTERS/Alessandro Bianchi/files TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY,
19 of March 2016 13:25:56
During a recent dinner party I found myself making a distinction between ingredient-driven cooking and culture-driven cooking and explaining that I believe the best cooking is culture-driven. Here's what I mean by that.When a cook is inspired to a manner of cooking derived from a particular culture, their creation respects that culture. They are cooking in a culture-driven mode whether the dish cooked is an old standard or a new recipe. The inspiration keeps the newly created or inspired dish true to the heart and soul of that particular cuisine.Ingredient-driven cooking, on the other hand, is all too often the fetishization of a food incorporated into a cooking that lacks the very soul that we want to taste. Ingredient-driven cooking is enamored with the food rather than the culture of the cook or cuisine.CULTURE SHOULD TRUMP FASHIONAs consumers and cooks we confront a barrage of the latest "hot" ingredients, methods and prepared dishes. Food marketers, restaurant chefs, bloggers and food magazine editors contribute to this onslaught of looking for the next hot thing. It might be a food promoted for its trendy ingredients, such as açai berry or a new kind of grain such as quinoa, or a resurrected vegetable such as kale, or a method such as sous-vide or a whole category such as tapas or sushi.Twenty-years ago, fresh pasta became more desirable and fashionable than dried pasta, its proponents seemingly ignorant over the uses of both in Italian cooking. They were ingredient-driven, not culture-driven.Tapas is a good place to start to talk about this distinction because in America tapas have no other meaning than "appetizers on little plates that we will call tapas." But tapas are a category of not merely foods, but of a way of eating, and not just in Spain, but historically and specifically, in Andalusia. A tapa in Spain is not an appetizer. It is much more, it is part of a culture.[caption id="attachment_7662" align="alignleft" width="300"] The Irati tapas bar in Barcelona, quite different from what is sold in the united States. Photo: Reuters/ Clifford A. Wright.[/caption]Now, that doesn't mean we can't invent new things, new categories, but let us respect the culturefrom which new culinary gifts came. Let's be gracious and learn about this culinary culture. It will help us cook better. After all, hundreds of years of development of the tapas bar in Andalusia will provide more foundation to our culinary thinking than the 10 years the word has been popular in the United States.Look past the hot ingredientsI've looked at restaurant menus of Mediterranean-inspired restaurants and I see a variety of well-known meze under a category heading called "tapas." Hummus is not tapa, it's a meze. They are not similar because they are little foods on small plates. That's not what is germane about these foods. What's germane is that they come from and are eaten within a particular culinary cultureand that they function in a particular way. As an aside, "hummus" does not mean "dip" it means "chickpea" and the meze you eat when you eat hummus is hummus bi'l-tahina, chickpeas with sesame seed paste.That might seem a minor issue, but it's essential to what I'm saying. In America, it seems the fetishization of food is in full throttle. Americans celebrate ingredients totally devoid of their cultural and emotional context.In America, we eat sushi, presented as raw fish, and rarely as Japanese food. Restaurants serve tapas, little foods (growing bigger all the time in America) on little plates, and not a cultural heritage of Andalusia. Imagine looking at a Vermeer painting and admiring the frame and not the tilt of the maid's head, the pouring of the milk, or the light from the window. This is what ingredient-driven cooking is like.[caption id="attachment_7664" align="alignright" width="300"] The culinary culture behind a dish or food can provide a stronger foundation than short lived fashion. Photo:Reuters: Clifford A. Wright.[/caption]Now this does not mean we should not be concerned with ingredients. However, when the ingredient drives our cooking over and above the culinary context, it becomes a fetish. Do we want to cook and eat saumon à l'unilateral because of omega-3 or because of the French technique of cooking on one-side-only, skin-side-down, in a covered pan over high heat that creates an extraordinarily delicious and easy-to-prepare dish that has been popular with French families for generations?Similarly, consider the fashion of heirloom tomatoes. Heirloom tomatoes can be wonderful, but it isn't the heirloom quality that makes them wonderful. It's where they are grown and how they are grown that make them wonderful. However, one does not buy $5-a-pound heirloom tomatoes simply to make a tomato sauce. What I'm suggesting is that you buy tomatoes best suited for the preparation you are making and not what other people say, i.e. fashion.We don't cook in a vacuum. We cook because we live and breathe a culture that provides an ineluctable connection and foundation to who we are.
CLIFFORD A. WRIGHT (ZESTER DAILY)